One sign of a good problem is that it suggests lots of other analogous problems, and this is certainly the case with Furstenburg's Conjecture. The key feature of the conjecture is the joint action of two (or more) commuting algebraic mappings. We give two examples.
Katok and Spatzier ([
MR 97d:58116] and errata in
[
MR 99c:58093]), while trying to understand Rudolph's ideas,
developed them in the context to two commuting automorphisms
and
of a finite-dimensional torus, which are of course
assumed be independent enough to rule out obvious exceptions.
They showed, for example, that any measure that is simultaneously
invariant under
and
, and that has positive entropy with
respect to, say,
, must be a multiple of Lebesgue measure on
the unstable foliation of
on the torus. This does not show
directly that the measure is Lebesgue measure in all cases, but
does in some cases with further assumptions.
There are also analogous questions for totally disconnected
groups, although here the statements are more intricate because
of the existence of many more ``obvious'' invariant sets.
A typical example is due originally to Ledrappier
[
MR 80b:28030]. Let be the subgroup of
defined by the
condition that
for all
. Let
shift an array one place to the left,
and
shift it one place down, so that
and
are
commuting automorphisms of
. What are the invariant measures
for the joint actions of
and
? Here there are many more
compact invariant sets than just finite sets, and each supports
at least one invariant measure. Nevertheless, there may well be a
simple algebraic classification of the invariant measures, even
in this case.
Back to the
main index
for The Furstenburg Conjecture and Rigidity.