The distribution of Fourier coefficients of half-integral weight forms
Let
be a newform of weight
for the full modular group, and let
be a cusp form of weight
and level 4 which is associated to
by the Shimura map. We normalize
by requiring that
and we normalize
by requiring that
Then for squarefree
with
we have, by the formula of Kohnen and Zagier,
where
In particular, the Riemann Hypothesis for
implies that
for an appropriate choice of
.
If the bound
holds, then a similar bound for
will hold (but with
replaced by
).
The question here is to decide which (if either) of these bounds represents
the true state of affairs.
If
has a square factor, then
can be determined from values of
where
.
It is known, by Deligne's theorem, that
where
is the number of divisors of
. Of course,
so
that we can write
where
is real. The conjecture of Sato and Tate about the distribution of the
asserts that
for
.
A consequence of the Sato-Tate conjecture is that there are infinitely many
(actually a positive proportion of
) for which
for any given
. The maximum order of
is given by
The Sato-Tate conjecture implies the same assertion with
replaced by
.
Thus, in particular, we find that
and we expect this bound to be sharp in the sense that the
cannot be replaced by anything smaller.
Thus, if the ``smaller'' bound is true for
then there is a great variation between the distribution of the Fourier coefficients
according to whether
is square
or squarefree.
Back to the
main index
for L-functions and Random Matrix Theory.