A possible route to understanding the correlation functions
of zeros of L-functions is via integrals of ratios of
L-functions near the critical line. The simplest nontrivial
case is the following formula conjectured
by Farmer [
MR 95a:11076]. Suppose are of size
and
have positive real part. It
was conjectured that
The above formula was obtained from a mollified mean value
of the -function. This formula can be differentiated with
respect to any of
, leading to other conjectures, such as
for the mean 2nd and 4th moments of
near the critical line.
This is useful because those moments are relevant in the
study of the distribution of the prime numbers.
Combining the 2nd moment of
with work of Goldston, Gonek, and Montgomery,
shows that the above formula implies Montgomery's pair correlation
conjecture almost everywhere.
This is interesting because the above formula was
not explicitly based on any conjectures about the primes,
nor did it obviously rely on any strong assumptions about the
distribution of the zeros.
If the -functions in the above
extression are replaced by the characteristic polynomial of a matrix
from the Circular Unitary Ensemble and then averaged over the
ensemble, the result agrees with the formula conjectured above.
This suggests a way to conjecture more complicated versions
if this formula, and may give a framework for a better understanding
of which aspects of the zeros of
-function should be
governed by random matrix theory.
Recently Conrey, Farmer, Keating, and Snaith have shown that it is
possible to use Dirichlet series
techniques to conjecture generalizations of the above formula,
both in terms of having more -functions and relaxing the
restriction that
be of size
.
The results agree with the formulas obtained from random
matrix theory.
This could lead to a conjecture for the
full main term in the
th moment of the
-function
on the critical line.
It would be useful to fully understand the consequences of formulas like the one conjectured above, to find more formulas which give a clear connection with the GUE hypothesis, and to have a unified picture of the connection between various integrals of L-functions and the distribution of zeros. And, of course, it would be good to identify an approach which could lead to a proof of these formulas.
There is a formal similarity between the integrals of ratios of
-functions and the ratios of
-functions
in Barnes' type integrals. It may be that a natural object to study
is an integral of ratios Riemann
-functions, which would
include both
-factors and
-function factors.
Back to the
main index
for L-functions and Random Matrix Theory.