Joint work with A. Skorobogatov.
Let be an indefinite division quaternion algebra over
(indefinite means that
). Let
be a maximal order in
. Let
be the discriminant
of
(the product of primes that do not split
), and suppose
. Let
be the union of the upper and lower half
planes and consider the Shimura curve
![]() |
Let be a prime,
. Let
,
be the inverse images in
of the
usual subgroups of
. Let
,
. Then
is a
Galois covering, with Galois group
,
which is unramified if
such that
,
.
Consider now the covering
of curves over
, as defined above. We want to find an imaginary quadratic
field
and
and
such that for any twist of
by a
character
,
but
. Since, as in Skorobogatov's talk,
, this shows that the Hasse
principle for
fails and provides a cohomological obstruction that
explains this failure.
Suppose first that for a prime
dividing
. Then
has
bad reduction at
. Furthermore, it is known
(Jordan-Livne-Varshavsky) that
if
is inert. So we suppose that all primes dividing
are inert in
.
Now consider what happens at .
We have the usual
model of
with two components
,
intersecting at supersingular points defined over
.
We assume again that
is inert. It can be shown that
Supersingular Points
. This then shows
that if
is inert,
for
.
Finally, we consider places which do not divide
. If
is
ramified at such a place
,
. So we need
only consider characters unramified outside
. If we
suppose further
Now, and
have good reduction outside
. To deal
with places
, we count points to show that
the curve has points over
(which is
or
according as
is split or inert in
), then
lift them using Hensels Lemma.
The point counts make use of the following trace formulas:
then
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Putting these together we get the following proposition:
We can now find counterexamples to the
Hasse principle as follows:
Example: ,
,
.
Back to the
main index
for Rational and integral points on higher dimensional varieties.