Skip to main content

Workshop · No. 1103

Post-quantum group-based cryptography

at the American Institute of Mathematics

Dates

April 29, 2024 – May 3, 2024

Organized by

Delaram Kahrobaei
Ludovic Perret

This workshop, sponsored by AIM and the NSF, will be devoted to developing post-quantum group-based cryptosystems with rigorous security analysis.

The goal of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) is to design cryptosystems which are secure against classical and quantum adversaries. A fundamental assumption in PQC is that there are some computational problems that remain hard in the quantum setting. The main families of PQC systems include code-based, hash-based, lattice-based, and multivariate-based and isogeny-based cryptography. Recent attacks on popular NIST candidates, multivariate- and isogeny-based systems, emphasized the need for diversity of post-quantum approaches and pushed NIST to issue a new call for post-quantum signature schemes in 2023.

The purpose of this workshop is to explore an alternative approach to design post-quantum schemes : namely, group-based cryptography. This is another traditional approach for PQC that received less attention than the families mentioned above.

The topics addressed during the workshop will include:

  • Design of new group-based primitives
  • Cryptanalysis of Group-based primitives
  • Quantum analysis of hard problems arising in group-based cryptography
The workshop will bring together participants with backgrounds in cryptography, quantum algorithms and group-based theory.

This event will be run as an AIM-style workshop. Participants will be invited to suggest open problems and questions before the workshop begins, and these will be posted on the workshop website. These include specific problems on which there is hope of making some progress during the workshop, as well as more ambitious problems which may influence the future activity of the field. Lectures at the workshop will be focused on familiarizing the participants with the background material leading up to specific problems, and the schedule will include discussion and parallel working sessions.

Participants

32
Christopher Battarbee University of York, Sorbonne University cb2036@york.ac.uk
Ryann Cartor Clemson University rcartor@clemson.edu
David Cui Massachusetts Institute of Technology dzcui@mit.edu
Giovanni Di Crescenzo Peraton Labs gdicrescenzo@peratonlabs.com
Dorian Goldfeld Columbia University dg15@columbia.edu
Paul Gunnells UMass Amherst pgunnells@veridify.com
David Jao University of Waterloo djao@uwaterloo.ca
Delaram Kahrobaei CUNY, Queens College, University of York (UK), NYU dkahrobaei@gc.cuny.edu
Thomas Koberda University of Virginia thomas.koberda@virginia.edu
Laura Maddison University of Ottawa lmadd036@uottawa.ca
Conchita Martinez-Perez Universidad de Zaragoza conmar@unizar.es
Krystal Maughan University of Vermont krystal.maughan@gmail.com
Seyed Sajjad Nezhadi University of Maryland sajjad@umd.edu
Edoardo Persichetti Florida Atlantic University epersichetti@fau.edu
Shahed Sharif California State University San Marcos ssharif@csusm.edu
Alice Silverberg University of California, Irvine asilverb@math.uci.edu
Daniel Smith-Tone daniel-c.smith@louisville.edu
Rainer Steinwandt The University of Alabama in Huntsville rs0141@uah.edu
Martina Vigorito University of Salerno marvigorito@unisa.it
Christelle Vincent University of Vermont christelle.vincent@uvm.edu