for this workshop

## Algorithmic randomness

at the

American Institute of Mathematics, San Jose, California

organized by

Denis R. Hirschfeldt, Joseph S. Miller, Jan Reimann, and Theodore A. Slaman

This workshop, sponsored by AIM and the NSF, will be devoted to algorithmic randomness and its applications. Combining computability and probability, algorithmic randomness allows for a pointwise approach to many concepts that are classically measure-based, such as entropy and Hausdorff dimension. Recent results in the area indicate the applicability of algorithmic randomness to a wide variety of questions, from the fractal geometry of sets in Euclidean spaces to effective diophantine approximation.

The workshop will focus on several particularly promising applications:

- Point-to-set principles: there is a tight correspondence between the
classical Hausdorff dimension of a set and the effective Hausdorff dimension of its
points. Questions about the Hausdorff dimension of a set can then be translated
into questions about the relative randomness and effective dimension of single
points. For example, if $a$ and $b$ are points in $(n-1)$-dimensional Euclidean space,
and $x$ is a real Martin-Löf random with respect to $(a,b)$, what is the effective
Hausdorff dimension of $(x,ax+b)$? This is closely connected to the Kakeya
conjecture.
- Effective Fourier dimension: Fourier measures are characterized by the
asymptotic behavior of their Fourier-Stieltjes coefficients. If a real is random
with respect to a non-trivial Fourier measure, it exhibits randomness in terms
of a linear lower bound on its Kolmogorov complexity on the one hand, and strong
combinatorial randomness on the other hand, because any such real has to be
absolutely normal. Understanding which reals are random with respect to a
Fourier measure would help shed light on the nature of Salem sets, that is, sets
for which Hausdorff dimension and Fourier dimension coincide.
- Redundancy of Information. The effective dimension of a real can be altered by changing individual bits of its binary expansion. The distance between the original and the altered sequence can be measured by the Besicovitch distance in Cantor space. If we want to reduce dimension from $s$ to $t$, what is the best bound, in general, on the distance from a given sequence of dimension $s$ to the nearest sequence of dimension $t$?

This event will be run as an AIM-style workshop. Participants will be invited to suggest open problems and questions before the workshop begins, and these will be posted on the workshop website. These include specific problems on which there is hope of making some progress during the workshop, as well as more ambitious problems which may influence the future activity of the field. Lectures at the workshop will be focused on familiarizing the participants with the background material leading up to specific problems, and the schedule will include discussion and parallel working sessions.

Space and funding is available for a few more participants. If you would like to participate, please apply by filling out the on-line form no later than February 10, 2020. Applications are open to all, and we especially encourage women, underrepresented minorities, junior mathematicians, and researchers from primarily undergraduate institutions to apply.

Before submitting an application, please read the description of the AIM style of workshop.

For more information email *workshops@aimath.org*